As of 12/04/2020
Indus: 30,218 +248.74 +0.8%
Trans: 12,742 +155.26 +1.2%
Utils: 856 -10.76 -1.2%
Nasdaq: 12,464 +87.05 +0.7%
S&P 500: 3,699 +32.40 +0.9%
|
YTD
+5.9%
+16.9%
-2.6%
+38.9%
+14.5%
|
 30,700 or 28,250 by 12/15/202013,500 or 11,700 by 12/15/2020 830 or 925 by 12/15/202012,500 or 11,400 by 12/15/20203,750 or 3,400 by 12/15/2020 |
As of 12/04/2020
Indus: 30,218 +248.74 +0.8%
Trans: 12,742 +155.26 +1.2%
Utils: 856 -10.76 -1.2%
Nasdaq: 12,464 +87.05 +0.7%
S&P 500: 3,699 +32.40 +0.9%
|
YTD
+5.9%
+16.9%
-2.6%
+38.9%
+14.5%
| |
|
30,700 or 28,250 by 12/15/202013,500 or 11,700 by 12/15/2020830 or 925 by 12/15/202012,500 or 11,400 by 12/15/20203,750 or 3,400 by 12/15/2020 | ||
My book,
Trading Basics
If you click on the above link and then buy the book (or anything) while at Amazon.com, the referral will help support this site. Thanks.
$ $ $
Do chart patterns in low priced stocks outperform those from higher priced stocks? This page answers that question.
I looked at 16,664 chart patterns of various types (head-and-shoulders, double bottoms, and so on) in 958 stocks from 1991 to early 2005, encompassing both bull and bear markets. Not all stocks covered the entire period.
| Price Range | Up Breakout | Samples | Down Breakout | Samples |
$0-10 | 61% | 1,457 | 21% | 1,091 |
10-20 | 42% | 2,145 | 19% | 1,879 |
20-30 | 33% | 1,330 | 18% | 1,215 |
30-40 | 30% | 605 | 18% | 587 |
40-50 | 24% | 293 | 17% | 280 |
50-60 | 24% | 113 | 19% | 117 |
60-70 | 21% | 48 | 19% | 40 |
>70 | 23% | 39 | 25% | 40 |
The above table shows bull market results for both upward and downward breakout directions. For example, the 1,457 chart patterns with breakouts priced over $0 and equal to or below $10, had an average rise of 61% after the breakout and before price tumbled by at least 20%, or closed below the chart pattern low, whichever came first. The 1,091 samples with downward breakouts showed declines averaging 21% before price climbed by at least 20% or rose above the top of the chart pattern, whichever came first.
Upward breakouts do best for low priced stocks and performance deteriorates as the breakout price rises until the samples skew the results. Downward breakouts show the same trend, with low priced stocks outperforming the high priced ones until the low sample counts skew the results.
| Price Range | Up Breakout | Samples | Down Breakout | Samples |
$0-10 | 49% | 318 | 25% | 321 |
10-20 | 37% | 822 | 25% | 706 |
20-30 | 27% | 709 | 23% | 570 |
30-40 | 24% | 449 | 25% | 432 |
40-50 | 22% | 267 | 23% | 268 |
50-60 | 16% | 163 | 25% | 146 |
60-70 | 17% | 69 | 31% | 46 |
>70 | 19% | 56 | 31% | 43 |
The above table shows the bear market results for both up and down breakouts using the same methodology described earlier. For upward breakouts, the trend is clear with low price stocks outperforming the more expensive ones until the samples become few. Downward breakouts hold steady with declines averaging between 23% and 25% until samples become few.
-- Thomas Bulkowski
See Also
|
Support this site! Clicking any of the books (below) takes you to
Amazon.com.
| My novels: |
 
 
 
 
|
My wife is like an angel, always up in the air harping on something.
on 