Subscribe to RSS feeds Bulkowski Blog via RSS

Thomas Bulkowski’s successful investment activities allowed him to retire at age 36. He is an internationally known author and trader with 30 years of stock market experience and widely regarded as a leading expert on chart patterns. His books, including the best selling Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns, have been translated into many languages. He may be reached at

Support this site! Clicking on his books below takes you to Amazon.com. If you buy ANYTHING, they pay for the referral.

Here are his books...

Bulkowski's Failure Rate Study

Elliott
Wave
Funda-
mentals
Indicators Market
Review
Pattern
Rank
Psychology Quiz Research Software Test
Portfolios
Trading
Class
Trading
Setups
Tutorial Watch
List
ThePatternSite.com logo Busted
Patterns
Candles Chart
Patterns
Event
Patterns
Scoring
Patterns
Volume
Patterns
Daily Small Patterns
Market
Industrials (^DJI):
Transports (^DJT):
Utilities (^DJU):
Nasdaq (^IXIC):
S&P 500 (^GSPC):
As of 05/21/2013
15,388 52.30 0.3%
6,519 8.01 0.1%
515 0.79 0.2%
3,502 5.69 0.2%
1,669 2.87 0.2%
YTD
17.4%
22.8%
13.8%
16.0%
17.0%
Tom's Targets    Overview: 05/14/2013
15,500 or 14,850 by 06/01/2013
6,750 or 6,200 by 06/01/2013
525 or 500 by 06/01/2013
3,600 or 3,300 by 06/01/2013
1,700 or 1,600 by 06/01/2013
Wilder RSI: 24.7%

Written and copyright © 2009-2013 by Thomas N. Bulkowski. All rights reserved.

Do chart patterns fail more often now than they used to? Yes, according to this study.

Failure Rate Study Summary

A study using nearly 14,000 chart patterns covering the years from 1991 to 2008 shows that chart patterns fail between two and four times more often now than they did in the past. For example, the average failure rate of chart patterns to climb at least 10% in the 1990s bull market was 14%. During the bull market years of 2003 to 2007, the failure rate had doubled to 28%.

Downward breakouts showed a similar trend with the average 10% failure rate rising from 26% in the 1990s to 49% during the bull market years of the 2000s.

Here is a more extreme example. In 1991 the 10% failure rate was 11% but peaked at 44% in 2007. In other words, four times as many chart patterns failed to show post breakout rises of at least 10% in 2007 compared to 1991.

Failure Rate Study Methodology

I started with 13,932 chart patterns known to be good. That means I inspected them multiple times and have used them as research material for my books. For gains, I looked at all chart patterns with upward breakouts and measured the rise from the closing price the day before the breakout to the ultimate high.. For losses, I used chart patterns with downward breakouts and measured the decline from the close the day before the breakout to the ultimate low..

I did not use all of the chart pattern types at my disposal because some worked best on the weekly scale (horns and pipes) and discarded others because the breakout price is often difficult to determine (scallops, rounding turns, and broadening patterns, for example). Here is a list of the 23 pattern types that I used in the study.

  • Diamond tops and bottoms
  • Double tops and bottoms (all combinations of Adam and Eve)
  • Head-and-shoulder tops and bottoms (both simple and complex)
  • Rectangle tops and bottoms
  • Rising and falling wedges
  • Triangles: ascending, descending, and symmetrical
  • Triple tops and bottoms

For more information on any of these chart patterns, click the link to take you to the index.

Top

Failure Rate Results: Upward Breakouts

Failure rates for upward breakouts since 1991

The above chart shows three failure rates, 10%, 20%, and 40%, arbitrarily chosen. The failure rates are a count of the number of times chart patterns fail to show post breakout rises of 10%, 20%, and 40% as a percentage of the number of chart patterns for that year.

For example, in 1991, eleven percent of the 140 chart patterns with upward breakouts failed to show a post breakout rise of at least 10%. In 1992, thirteen percent of the 494 chart patterns failed that year to post gains of at least 10%.

The chart shows the upward trend of failures over time. In 1991, the 10% failure rate stood at 11%. By 2007, the failure rate peaked at 44% before dropping to 32% in 2008. The 20% failure rate climbed from 22% in 1991 to 64% in 2007 before declining slightly to 62% in 2008. Finally, the 40% failure rate increased from 64% to 88% over the 1991 to 2008 period.

If you compare the bull market years in the 1990s to the 2003 to 2007 bull market, we find the average 10% failure rate climbed from 14% to 28%. In other words, 14% of chart patterns failed to show post breakout rises of at least 10% in the 1990s but that had doubled to 28% in the 2000s.

Looking at the relative height of each line, we see how often chart patterns show post breakout rises of 10%, 20% and 40% or higher. In 2008, 88% of chart patterns will fail to show post breakout rises of at least 40%. In other words, just 12% of chart patterns showed large gains in the bear market start of 2008. This compares to the 60% rate in 2000, the year that bear market began.

Top

Failure Rate Results: Downward Breakouts

Failure rates for downward breakouts since 1991

Downward breakouts show a similar trend as the above chart shows. The average 10% failure rate in the bullish 1990s was 26%. This had climbed to 49% during the bull market years of 2003 to 2007. The 20% failure rate climbed from 59% to 75%, and the 40% failure rate inched from 91% to 96%.

Notice that the failure rates from downward breakouts tend to drop during bear markets, just as one would expect.

The change from bear market to bull market in 2002 to 2003 showed the 10% failure rate spike from 15% to 48%. The 20% failure rate double from 42% to 83%. Clearly, you do not want to be short when the bear market ends.

-- Thomas Bulkowski

Top 

See Also

Copyright © 2009-2013 by Thomas N. Bulkowski. All rights reserved. 24 hours in a day. 24 beers in a case. Coincidence?