Subscribe to RSS feeds Bulkowski Blog via RSS

Thomas Bulkowski’s successful investment activities allowed him to retire at age 36. He is an internationally known author and trader with 30+ years of stock market experience and widely regarded as a leading expert on chart patterns. He may be reached at

Support this site! Clicking the links (below) takes you to If you buy ANYTHING, they pay for the referral.

Picture of Bumper.
Picture of the head's law.
Chart Patterns: After the Buy
Getting Started in Chart Patterns, Second Edition book.
Trading Basics: Evolution of a Trader book.
Fundamental Analysis and Position Trading: Evolution of a Trader book.
Swing and Day Trading: Evolution of a Trader book.
Visual Guide to Chart Patterns book.
Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns 2nd Edition book.

Bulkowski's Long-Term Debt

Class Elliott Wave Fundamentals Psychology Quiz Research Setups Software Tutorials More...
Candles Chart
Small Patterns
Industrials (^DJI):
Transports (^DJT):
Utilities (^DJU):
Nasdaq (^IXIC):
S&P500 (^GSPC):
As of 10/20/2017
23,329 165.59 0.7%
9,972 85.59 0.9%
749 1.35 0.2%
6,629 23.98 0.4%
2,575 13.11 0.5%
Tom's Targets    Overview: 10/16/2017
23,700 or 22,700 by 11/01/2017
10,300 or 9,700 by 11/01/2017
775 or 725 by 11/01/2017
6,700 or 6,500 by 11/01/2017
2,625 or 2,525 by 11/01/2017

Written by and copyright © 2005-2017 by Thomas N. Bulkowski. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: You alone are responsible for your investment decisions. See Privacy/Disclaimer for more information.

My book, Fundamental Analysis and Position TradingFundamental Analysis and Position Trading: Evolution of a Trader book., discusses long term debt starting on page 61. I show a picture of the book on the left.

If you click on this link and then buy the book at, the referral will help support this site.


$ $ $


This page reviews a study concerning the stock performance of companies with and without long-term debt.

Long-Term Debt Summary

Value Line defines long-term debt as "the portion of borrowings (including bank notes, debentures, and capitalized leases) that will be due not in the current 12 months, but in future operating years."

I thought that debt was bad, that high levels risk ruining the company and no debt was preferred. Too high debt is detrimental, of course, but so is too little debt, according to this study. I found that companies that had long-term debt had stocks that performed better than those companies with no debt.

Long-Term Debt Methodology

I used the Value Line investment survey and typed in their long-term debt numbers to build a database of 178 stocks with data ranging from 12/30/1991 to 7/11/2008.

After completing the database, I logged the close-to-close price change from 1 to 5 years out, looking forward from the base year. The base year ranged from 1992 to 2006. Not all stocks covered the entire range. Years with no numbers were excluded. The price change measured from the close on the last trading day of each year. Years 2008 and later are not included since the year had not completed as of the time of this study.

Top of page   More

Long-Term Debt Results

The following table shows the stock performance companies with and without debt over time.

 1 yr2 yrs3 yrs4 years5 years
No debt10.6%11.4%12.3%11.1%10.3%

For example, if companies had debt during year 0, they gained an average of 12.2% the following year. Companies with no debt showed stock prices rising 10.6%.

In each of the five years, companies with debt showed better stock performance over the coming one to five years than did those companies with no long-term debt. The reason for this, I believe, is leverage. Those companies with a modest (whatever that means) amount of debt put it to work to make more money. Their stock performance reflected that success by rising.

-- Thomas Bulkowski

Top of page   More  

See Also

Written by and copyright © 2005-2017 by Thomas N. Bulkowski. All rights reserved. Disclaimer: You alone are responsible for your investment decisions. See Privacy/Disclaimer for more information. Q: What should you give a man who has everything? Q: A woman to show him how to work it.