As of 02/21/2025
Indus: 43,428 -748.63 -1.7%
Trans: 16,034 -430.64 -2.6%
Utils: 1,023 +3.75 +0.4%
Nasdaq: 19,524 -438.35 -2.2%
S&P 500: 6,013 -104.39 -1.7%
|
YTD
+2.1%
+0.9%
+4.1%
+1.1%
+2.2%
|
|
As of 02/21/2025
Indus: 43,428 -748.63 -1.7%
Trans: 16,034 -430.64 -2.6%
Utils: 1,023 +3.75 +0.4%
Nasdaq: 19,524 -438.35 -2.2%
S&P 500: 6,013 -104.39 -1.7%
|
YTD
+2.1%
+0.9%
+4.1%
+1.1%
+2.2%
| |
| ||
Initial release on 1/29/2025.
This article discusses the 3-bar chart pattern, including what to look for and how it behaves in stocks, exchange traded funds, and cryptocurrency.
If you use this pattern for only one thing, use it to predict an upward breakout. That can be valuable in trading. It's correct 85% of the time. By that, I mean price moves above the top of the highest bar in the pattern 85% of the time (versus moving below the bottom of the lowest bar of the three). Not included in the count was the price doing both, on the same price bar (and upward and downward breakout in one day).
I've more small patterns to test, but this one ranks 22 where 1 is best, out of 34 patterns.
The following table shows the identification rules.
Look at the figure. The first bar in this example is a black candle but it need not be. However, price closes lower than the prior day's close. Don't confuse this with a close below the same day's open.
The middle price bar has a low below the two adjacent price bars.
The last bar in the pattern closes above the highs of the other price bars. A less-stringent variation has the last bar closing above the high of the middle bar only. In testing, because this is such a prolific pattern, I used the harder test, meaning the last price bar in the pattern has to close above the highs of the other two bars.
Characteristic | Discussion |
Three Bars | This is a three price bar pattern. |
First Bar | First bar in the pattern has a lower close compared to the prior day. |
Middle Bar | The middle bar in the pattern has a low below the two adjacent bars. |
Last Bar | The last bar in the pattern has a close above the highs of the other two bars. |
Breakout | Price breaks out upward 85% of the time. |
Performance | Sucks. It's well down the best-performer list when compared to other small patterns. |
Trading using a target exit is simple to explain. Look at the adjacent stock chart.
I highlighted the 3-bar pattern in the box. The first bar shows a lower close. The middle bar is below the other two (low price), and the last bar (high price) is above the other two.
I placed a buy stop a penny above the top of the pattern. An upward breakout happens four days after the pattern ends, as shown. However, the stock drops, slowly, eventually trigging a stop placed a penny below the middle price bar.
If the trade had worked as expected, I had a sell order ready at a price that was twice the height of the pattern added to the top of it.
As explained in the example above, a buy signal happened when the stock climbed a penny of more above the top of the pattern (that is, I placed a buy stop a penny above the highest price bar in the pattern). I set an order to sell at a price twice as high as the height of the 3-Bar pattern added to the highest bar in the pattern. I placed a stop loss a penny below the bottom of the pattern to help limit losses (by catching a dropping stock automatically).
The tables shows results for bull markets with upward breakouts (only) and an inbound price trend either up or down. I used 489 stocks in the test. For additional testing methodology details, click the link.
Metric | 3-Bar In Up Trend | Up Trend Benchmark | 3-Bar in Down Trend | Down Trend Benchmark |
Trades | 8,712 | 5,877 | 7,595 | 5,278 |
Average profit/loss per trade | $90.81 | $73.54 | $89.38 | $83.91 |
Win/loss ratio | 42% | 41% | 41% | 42% |
Average hold time (days) | 24 | 21 | 24 | 21 |
Winning trades | 3,644 | 2,400 | 3,135 | 2,212 |
Average gain of winners | 9% | 8% | 9% | 9% |
Average hold time of winners (days) | 30 | 27 | 32 | 28 |
Losing trades | 5,068 | 3,477 | 4,460 | 3,066 |
Average loss | -5% | -5% | -5% | -5% |
Average hold time of losers (days) | 19 | 17 | 20 | 18 |
Both up and down trends produced results that beat the benchmark except those 3-bars in an uptrend gave better results than did those in a downtrend.
I used the same method to test the 3-bar in exchange traded funds (ETFs) as I did in stocks. The chart shows an example trade that worked.
A buy stop triggered not a penny above the top of the 3-bar, but at the opening price after the ETF gapped open higher. A stop loss order lay ready to exit on an adverse move (placed a penny below the middle price bar).
The ETF reached the target exit near the peak, just a day before, sealing the trade for a profit.
This is the same test as the prior one except I used 94 exchange traded funds (ETFs) instead of common stocks.
Metric | 3-Bar In Up Trend | Up Trend Benchmark | 3-Bar In Down Trend | Down Trend Benchmark |
Trades | 7,275 | 6,792 | 5,651 | 5,700 |
Average profit/loss per trade | $68.16 | $68.94 | $62.97 | $68.34 |
Win/loss ratio | 44% | 44% | 43% | 43% |
Average hold time (days) | 22 | 21 | 22 | 21 |
Winning trades | 3,197 | 2,966 | 2,450 | 2,469 |
Average gain of winners | 6% | 6% | 6% | 6% |
Average hold time of winners (days) | 28 | 27 | 32 | 32 |
Losing trades | 4,078 | 3,826 | 3,201 | 3,231 |
Average loss | -3% | -3% | -4% | -4% |
Average hold time of losers (days) | 17 | 17 | 19 | 19 |
In both trend directions, the 3-Bar flops as a trading setup. Don't use this pattern in ETFs, at least, now how I tested it. However, the pattern in uptrends works better than in downtrends, which is the same finding as we saw in stocks.
I show an example of a 3-bar in a cryptocurrency, AAVE versus USD. The 3-bar is in the red square.
I used the same setup in crypto as I did in stocks and ETFs, that is, a buy stop placed a penny above the top of the pattern gets us into the trade on an upward breakout. A stop loss placed a penny below the bottom of the pattern helps limit losses, and a target exit appears at twice the height of the 3-bar pattern added to the top of it.
Entry happened a day after the pattern ended (upward breakout) and the ETF continued upward until reaching the target, where the position sold.
Metric | Shark In Up Trend | Up Trend Benchmark | Shark In Down Trend | Down Trend Benchmark |
Trades | 354 | 393 | 343 | 391 |
Average profit/loss per trade | $256.66 | $224.62 | $180.87 | $209.61 |
Win/loss ratio | 47% | 48% | 43% | 45% |
Average hold time (days) | 9 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
Winning trades | 166 | 187 | 147 | 175 |
Average gain of winners | 13% | 12% | 13% | 13% |
Average hold time of winners (days) | 9 | 10 | 9 | 11 |
Losing trades | 188 | 206 | 196 | 216 |
Average loss | -7% | -7% | -7% | -6% |
Average hold time of losers (days) | 9 | 7 | 9 | 7 |
The 3-bar pattern in the cryptocurrency world, at least for the securities I tested, works well in uptrends with the average profit per trade of $256.66 versus the benchmark $224.62. Downtrends were a disaster. Having written that, the example trade (chart above) shows the pattern in a downtrend...go figure.
-- Thomas Bulkowski
Other 3-bar patterns
Support this site! Clicking any of the books (below) takes you to
Amazon.com If you buy ANYTHING while there, they pay for the referral.
Legal notice for paid links: "As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
My Stock Market Books
|
My Novels
|