As of 12/20/2024
Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%
Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%
Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%
Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%
S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%
|
YTD
+13.7%
0.0%
+11.9%
+30.4%
+24.3%
|
44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/2025
16,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/2025
1,050 or 975 by 01/01/2025
20,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/2025
6,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025
|
As of 12/20/2024
Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%
Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%
Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%
Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%
S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%
|
YTD
+13.7%
0.0%
+11.9%
+30.4%
+24.3%
| |
44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/2025
16,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/2025
1,050 or 975 by 01/01/2025
20,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/2025
6,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025
| ||
Should you buy near the yearly low or use upward momentum to buy near the yearly high, surfing to a higher high? Research indicates that buying near the yearly low gives you better gains with lower risk.
I looked at 12,385 chart patterns using 25 different chart pattern types in 500 stocks from 1991 to 1996 and another 739 stocks from 1995 to 2005, encompassing both a bull and bear market. I wanted to know if it is better to buy within a third of the yearly low or buy within a third of the yearly high. Table 1 shows the results.
Market condition, breakout direction | Lowest 10% | Lowest Third | Middle Third | Highest Third | Highest 10% |
Bull market up breakout | 42% (179) | 38% (1421) | 35% (1874) | 36% (2715) | 36% (1294) |
Bull market down breakout | 21% (236) | 19% (705) | 17% (852) | 16% (871) | 15% (75) |
Bear market up breakout | 36% (118) | 32% (607) | 27% (764) | 23% (924) | 23% (413) |
Bear market down breakout | 30% (185) | 26% (461) | 23% (443) | 22% (263) | 16% (15) |
Let's take the lowest 10% column where it shows 42% (179). That means the average rise in a bull market from an upward breakout was 42% and 179 samples qualified. To qualify, the breakout must have been within 10% of the yearly trading range from the yearly low. The next column uses a third from the low, and so on until the last column. The last column is a mirror of the lowest 10% except it applies to the yearly high. Patterns that qualify are within 10% or less of the yearly price range below the yearly high.
Regardless of the breakout direction and market condition the average rise and the average decline are higher as the buy point approaches the yearly low.
What about risk? Does the risk of failure increase when you buy low? The next table shows the answer.
Failure Rate in a bull market, upward breakout | Lowest 10% | Lowest Third | Middle Third | Highest Third | Highest 10% |
5% | 3% (5) | 4% (62) | 5% (97) | 6% (168) | 6% (72) |
10% | 8% (15) | 12% (172) | 16% (307) | 16% (440) | 17% (217) |
15% | 17% (31) | 23% (320) | 28% (522) | 26% (711) | 27% (347) |
20% | 23% (41) | 32% (450) | 38% (711) | 34% (935) | 36% (469) |
25% | 32% (57) | 41% (589) | 46% (866) | 43% (1155) | 45% (583) |
Table 2 shows how often price fails to rise at least 5%, 10%, 15%, and so on in a bull market after an upward breakout from a chart pattern. Bull market/upward breakouts showed the highest sample counts (in parentheses) so that's why they were chosen. The sample counts are slim for the lowest 10%, but the trend is clear, especially when comparing the lowest third column with the columns to the right.
Failure rates decrease the closer to the yearly low the breakout occurs. In short, it means buy a chart pattern breakout near the yearly low, not the high, and stay out of the middle.
-- Thomas Bulkowski
Support this site! Clicking any of the books (below) takes you to
Amazon.com If you buy ANYTHING while there, they pay for the referral.
Legal notice for paid links: "As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
My Stock Market Books
|
My Novels
|
According to my calculations the problem doesn't exist.