As of 12/20/2024   Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%     Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%     Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%     Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%     S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%	YTD  +13.7%   0.0%    +11.9%    +30.4%    +24.3%	Targets    Overview: 12/12/2024     44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/2025   16,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/2025   1,050 or 975 by 01/01/2025   20,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/2025   6,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025
Chart Pattern Indicator: on 12/5/24

As of 12/20/2024   Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%     Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%     Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%     Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%     S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%	YTD  +13.7%   0.0%    +11.9%    +30.4%    +24.3%
Targets    Overview: 12/12/2024     44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/2025   16,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/2025   1,050 or 975 by 01/01/2025   20,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/2025   6,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025
Chart Pattern Indicator: on 12/5/24

Bulkowski on Time and Chart Pattern Width

Time vs Pattern Width: Summary, Methodology, and Results

This page examines the relationship between time to the ultimate high or low and pattern width.

$ $ $

My book, Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns Second Edition, shown on the left, has statistics about pattern size for each of the chart patterns in the book.

If you click on the above link and then buy the book (or anything) while at Amazon.com, the referral will help support this site. Thanks.

$ $ $

I used 40 different chart patterns (such as a falling wedge, double bottom, and so on) and over a thousand stocks, starting from July 1991 to June 2008. I logged the pattern width and the time it took to reach the ultimate high or low. The ultimate high or low is the highest high or lowest low, respectively, before price changes trend by at least 20%. As an example for the ultimate high, that means a decline of at least 20%. I uncovered 23,342 chart patterns that qualified. I used them all and wish I hadn't. The spreadsheet was about 25 megabytes in size and when you changed one variable, it took between 20 and 40 minutes to recalculate it.

Time vs Pattern Width: Downward Breakouts

The chart shows a frequency distribution of the ratio of the time from the end of the pattern to the ultimate low divided by the pattern width. Values above 1 mean it takes longer to reach the ultimate low than the pattern is wide. I show 1.00 circled in red. The bar is off the chart because 55% of the patterns take less than the pattern's width to reach the ultimate low.

The two red bars include the Fibonacci values of 38% and 62% (the first column includes all ratios up to 1. The next column includes the ratios from over 1 up to and including 1.05. Thus the 38% and 62% values will appear in the 1.40 and 1.65 columns). The right-most column is a catch-all because it includes all ratios over 2.40.

I do not see anything significant here at all. I had hoped to see peaks at the Fibonacci extension levels, but they are not there.

More

Time vs Pattern Width: Upward Breakouts

What about upward breakouts? A similar chart appears and I show that directly above. I used the same method as before only I compared the time to the ultimate high versus the pattern width. The red bars include the Fibonacci values of 38% and 62%, just as before. This time, however, fewer patterns flame out before exceeding the pattern width. Just 39% fall into the first category (every ratio up to 1.00). That means 61% of the patterns take longer to reach the ultimate high than the pattern's width.

-- Thomas Bulkowski

More

See Also

• Can we predict the breakout (by knowing the trend start and width)?
• Width. Use the width of peaks or valleys to improve trading results.
• Do narrow patterns perform best?
• What is the best performing height and width combination?
• Partial rises/declines and throws/pulls. Do throwbacks/pullbacks occur more often after partial rises and declines?
• Triangle apex and turning points. Price turns at apex 60% of the time.
• Height and width study. Tall patterns outperform.

Hi ocifer. I'm not under the affluence of incohol.