As of 05/13/2022
Indus: 32,197 +466.36 +1.5%
Trans: 14,456 +136.14 +1.0%
Utils: 993 +9.90 +1.0%
Nasdaq: 11,805 +434.04 +3.8%
S&P 500: 4,024 +93.81 +2.4%

YTD
11.4%
12.3%
+1.2%
24.5%
15.6%

33,500 or 30,500 by 06/01/2022
16,300 or 13,900 by 05/15/2022
950 or 1,100 by 05/15/2022
12,800 or 11,000 by 06/01/2022
4,250 or 3,850 by 06/01/2022

As of 05/13/2022
Indus: 32,197 +466.36 +1.5%
Trans: 14,456 +136.14 +1.0%
Utils: 993 +9.90 +1.0%
Nasdaq: 11,805 +434.04 +3.8%
S&P 500: 4,024 +93.81 +2.4%

YTD
11.4%
12.3%
+1.2%
24.5%
15.6%
 
33,500 or 30,500 by 06/01/2022
16,300 or 13,900 by 05/15/2022
950 or 1,100 by 05/15/2022
12,800 or 11,000 by 06/01/2022
4,250 or 3,850 by 06/01/2022
 
Initial release: 11/2/2020. Minor correction in mathematical expectancy calculation: 9/21/2021.
The bearish Carl V is named after its discoverer, Carl Vanhaesendonck. Mr. Vanhaesendonck lives in Belgium and spent the last two decades trading currencies, futures, and stocks (via CFD, parttime) as a daytrader or occasional swing trader, while maintaining a career as a global business development executive in the medical IT field. Now that he's retired, he's trading almost full time.
He wrote in an email, "I discovered the pattern probably 45 years ago, almost noting distractedly the [repetitive] outcome, first thinking 'that was just my imagination.' " He started trading the pattern in earnest this year [2020] and shared his discovery with me. I researched the pattern and below are some of my findings supported by the gracious help of Mr. Vanhaesendonck.
A review of this pattern suggests it's tough to make money trading it using various entry mechanisms, at least for stocks on the daily scale. I tested the Below 3 pattern (after an uptrend, find a peak followed by three price bars which are lower than the peak. Entry at the open on day 4). I also tested buying at 10% to 35% of the way down from D, and using a pivot as an entry. Nothing helped to make this pattern work well.
However, Mr. Vanhaesendonck uses this pattern in the currency market and often for day trading. He writes, "I have been able to make money with it." My analysis used only stocks and on the daily scale. Plus, this pattern is bearish and I tested it in a bull market. He lives and trades from Belgium and I'm in the U.S. In other words, there are plenty of reasons why this pattern didn't work for me, but maybe it will work for you. Besides, his trading method is worth considering. It might give you ideas about how to improve your own trading techniques.
Let me also take this opportunity to thank Carl Vanhaesendonck for sharing his pattern and trading techniques with me.
Overall performance rank (1 is best): not ranked*
Break even failure rate: 24%*
Average decline: 14%*
Pullback rate: 63%
Percentage meeting price target: 36% (pattern height subtracted from the high at D)
The above numbers are based on 1,619 perfect trades in bull markets. See the glossary for definitions. * These numbers are calculated not from the top of the pattern, but from point D (to the ultimate low). This measure better represents how Vanhaesendonck actually trades the chart pattern. He takes a position just after top D forms and rides price lower, often exiting at a target price, not the ultimate low. 
Bearish Carl V

The XABCD pattern shown in black on the lower right chart represents what an ideal bearish Carl V chart pattern looks like.
The ABCD portion of the bearish Carl V appears similar to a broadening bottom. A line joining AC slopes downward, and a line joining BD slopes upward. Point X may be far away from the pattern and is not part of the broadening shape. The five turns remind me of Fibonacci patterns except that you don't have to spend time calculating the Fibonacci turns.
Characteristic  Discussion  
Shape  Look for a minor high (X) which leads to a broadening pattern where a second valley is below the first (C is below A), and a second peak is above the first (D is above B).  
Turn X  X is a minor high. If price rises more than the median 15% (the rise from E to X in the chart to the right), you tend to see a better performing pattern (larger drop and almost half the failures).  
Turn A  Turn A is below X. It's a minor low, the lowest valley between X and A. There must not be a peak higher than X during the drop from X to A.  
Turn B  Peak B is above the price of A but below X. There must not be a peak above B nor a valley below A on the way from A to B.  
Turn C  Turn C is priced below A and it's the lowest valley between A and C. There must not be a peak higher than B on the move from B to C.  
Turn D  Turn D is above the price of B but below X. Again, no peak should be higher than D or a valley below C during the move from C to D. 
The following is what I learned from crunching the numbers using data from September 1992 to October 2020, finding 4,300 chart patterns in both bull and bear markets, with up and down breakouts. The results which follow apply only to bull markets.
Just over half the time (54%), price breaks out upward. An upward breakout means price closes above X (the top of the pattern) before it closes below C (the bottom of the pattern). However, we're interested in shorting a stock as price drops from D. That's what we'll focus on below.
Trading Tactic  Explanation 
Measure Rule

Measure rule  Reference the 'Measure Rule' figure to the right. Compute the height of the chart pattern from the highest peak (X) to the lowest valley (C). Subtract the result from the high price of turn D. Price reaches target E 36% of the time in bull markets.  
Continuations Best  If the Carl V acts as a continuation of the downward price trend (price trends lower going into peak X), performance improves and failures drop.  
Move After D  See the 'Move After D' chart on the right. As price drops from D on its way to G, 6% of the time it never makes it down to B. The other 94% drop to the price of B. After that, 54% make it to A and 39% make it to C. These percentage give you an idea how price behaves after D.  Move After D 
Entry  The challenge to trading this chart pattern is to determine when turn D is in place. My computer program used a window of 3 lower price bars on either side of a peak (7 bars total) to qualify D as a peak. You can use something similar (If price doesn't make a high above D for 3 price bars, then you've found D). Vanhaesendonck uses a better approach. He takes 25% of the pattern's height (X to C) and subtracts that from the high price at D. A trading order placed at that target price will get you in. I did try finding a pivot above B and below X but that tested worse, even with/without entering from 10% to 35% down from D. Pivot tests compare various shortterm reversal patterns which may help determine when D is in place. The pattern I use is what I call Below 3. Turns out the pattern performs best out of ten patterns studied. 
Reference the chart on the right but note it's not drawn to scale. The black line which turns red is price. The bearish Carl V is XABCD. The horizontal blue lines are various percentages of the XC distance subtracted from the high at D.
Vanhaesendonck has a short sale order waiting for price to drop to the 25% level. He enters the trade there, which confirms peak D as price turns downward. He places a stoploss order slightly above peak D.
Price drops. If it reaches the 50% value, he'll lower the stop to breakeven (slightly lower than 25% to cover the cost of trading).
If price drops to 100%, he scales out of half of the position. When price hits 200% of the height of the pattern (twice XC height), he closes out the trade.
If price doesn't reach 200%, he'll close out the trade if it closes above a pivot. I'll discuss pivots in a moment.
Here are his trading rules.
The example trade shows how this would work using AFLAC stock.
Here's how Vanhaesendonck exits the trade using a pivot (see the figure on the right).
Assume you've shorted a stock before pivot E.
If price makes a pivot (price makes a higher high and a higher low, price bar A compared to B) followed by a lower low (D is below B), place an order to close out the trade a penny above the pivot high (a penny above A).
If a lower pivot appears, move your stop to the new, lower pivot using the same technique.
For example, let's assume you have a stop a penny above pivot E. When do you lower your stop to the next lower pivot? Pivot A forms. When price makes a lower low (D is below B) lower the stop to a penny above A.
If price reaches your target, close out the trade. If it fails to reach your target and starts climbing, the nearest pivot high will close out the trade when price rises above the top of the pivot and trips the stoploss order (C).
Here are a list of tips to improve the performance of the bearish Carl V. This is based on insample tests of the chart pattern which are confirmed using outofsample data.
In the example shown in the adjacent chart, the bearish Carl V begins at X and ends at D. The trend begins at E and drops to the ultimate low at F.
I don't think the following bullets are additive. That means you probably won't get a better performing pattern if a number of these elements are true (but I could be wrong). What follows is a bearish Carl V in Occidental Pet which does very well and has a number of positives going for it.
In the chart shown to the right, the yearly high was at 54.05 on August 1, 2019 (not shown) and the yearly low was at 9 on March 18, 2020. D is at 18.03, placing D within a lowest third of the yearly high low range. This is good.
This is an example of a tall pattern. X is at 18.83 C is at 15.68 and D is at 18.03 for a height of (18.83  15.68)/18.03 or 17.4%, well above the 11.6% max. This is bad.
The Carl V in this example is 21 days wide, which is good.
A year earlier, the price was at 51.36 well above D at 18.03, so price drops, which is good.
The bearish Carl V is near the start of a downtrend which began at E (downtrends are good).
This is an example of how to use Vanhaesendonck's rules to trade the stock shown to the right.
Peak D1 is above B and below X, so assume it is the D peak. Compute the 25% entry price and find that X is priced at a high of 11.28, and C is at a low of 9.38, for a height of 1.90. A quarter (25%) of this is 48 cents. Subtracting 48 cents from the peak at D1 (11.17) gives an entry price of 10.69. The day after D1, the stock made a low of 10.81, remaining above the 10.69 entry price.
At D, the stock made a higher peak, it's between X and B, so assume this is turn D. The peak at D is at 11.27 so 48 cents below this (25% of the XC height) is 10.79. As the chart shows, price dropped below the 10.79 price when it reached a low of 10.65 at D.
If you're day trading the stock (this is a daily chart, not intraday), you'd enter the trade sometime during bar D (when the stock dropped below the 25% entry price).
On the daily chart, wait for price to drop below the 25% line after D.
In this case, the day after D the stock dropped to a low of 10.86, remaining above the 25% entry price of 10.79. However, the next day the trade would trigger so you'd short the stock.
Place a stoploss order a penny or two above the peak at D.
When the stock reached 50% of the XC height subtracted from D, lower the stoploss order to just below the 25% value (breakeven). The 50% number is half the pattern's height subtracted from the peak at D.
The stock continued down in a strong push lower, eventually reaching the target of 100%. That's the pattern's height subtracted from the price of the D peak. At this point, close out the trade on half of the position.
Price continued lower but bounced and formed a pivot at E. Bar E has a higher high and higher low than the prior price bar, so it's a pivot. When price makes a new low (G), drop the stoploss order to a penny above the price at E.
In this example, the stock resumed the downtrend.
At F, it made a lower priced pivot, the stock made a lower low at H, so drop the stoploss order to a penny above the high price at F.
After reaching bottom the stock bounced and triggered the stop to cover the short as shown on the chart. In this example, you would sell just a day after price reached the ultimate low. That's terrific timing.
I ran the bearish Carl V pattern through various tests, trying to find the best entry mechanism, which I show in Table 1. The results that follow are from outofsample tests which avoid curve fitting. They are on stocks, daily scale, from companies I no longer follow or no longer trade. Few use current prices. That may help explain why my results differ from what Vanhaesendonck sees in his trading.
Table 1 Summary: Table 1 shows that the closer you buy to peak D, the more you can make. Common sense, really. Only the bearish pivot entry resulted in a profit. The bearish pivot is a 3bar pattern. Price at the peak has a higher low and higher high than the prior price bar. The following day, price drops (a lower high). Enter at the open the following day.
The payoff ratio is the ratio of average winning trade to the average losing trade. The mathematical expectancy according to Vanhaesendonck is 100 x ((Winner % x payoff ratio)  Loser %). If a system has a payoff ratio of 70%, and wins 60% of the time, the ME would be 100 x (.60 x .70)  .40) or 2. He looks for values above 30 for stable systems.
The tests follow the rules described above for how Vanhaesendonck trades.
Test Description  % Win  Profit/Loss  Payoff Ratio  Mathematical Expectancy 
1. 110120% plus pivot entry  35%  ($.02)  178%  3 
2. Bearish pivot entry  31%  $.03  227%  1 
3. Below 3 pattern  35%  ($.17)  128%  20 
4. 10% down  24%  ($.06)  291%  6 
4. 15% down  25%  ($.21)  210%  23 
4. 20% down  30%  ($.23)  168%  20 
4. 25% down  35%  ($.26)  124%  22 
4. 30% down  42%  ($.27)  91%  20 
4. 35% down  46%  ($.33)  71%  21 
Table notes
Test 1: Testing found that there was a performance peak in the DC/BC extension around 115%, so I checked to see if it gave an advantage for finding peak D. The test used an entry as 110% to 120% extension of the DC to BC move plus a pivot to mark peak D. Enter 2 days after peak D (one day to confirm the pivot and entry is at open the next day).
Test 2 is the same as test 1 except I don't look for an extension. I look for a bearish pivot located between peaks B and X (which is the same as test 1). The first day after a peak confirms the pivot and entry is at the open the next day.
Test 3 looks for a Below 3 pattern (a peak followed by 3 price bars with highs below the peak. Enter on day 4).
Test 4: This uses a pivot to find peak D and takes various percentages of the XC height down from D as the entry price. I tested various entry percentages from 10% to 35%.
I didn't try different exit rules. Rather the percentages show how each of the entry mechanisms worked with Vanhaesendonck's trading rules.
Test Description  Test 1  Test 2  Test 10%  Test 15%  Test 20%  Test 25%  Test 30%  Test 35% 
Percentage dropped 50% of XC Height below D  37%  33%  34%  36%  40%  47%  53%  62% 
Percentage dropped 100% of XC height below D  10%  9%  12%  11%  12%  12%  14%  16% 
Sold at 200% of XC height (exit target)  1%  2%  2%  2%  2%  2%  2%  3% 
Stopped out above D  56%  59%  60%  56%  50%  41%  36%  28% 
Pivot stop  25%  22%  32%  31%  32%  34%  32%  30% 
Breakeven stop  17%  17%  7%  11%  16%  22%  30%  38% 
Table 2 Summary: The tests reveal that the farther down from D you enter, the more likely price will reach the 50% target. Few stocks will reach the 100% target and even fewer will reach the exit signal at 200% down. Most trades will see price reverse quickly and rise above D, hitting the stoploss order there.
Table notes
 Thomas Bulkowski
See Also

Support this site! Clicking any of the books (below) takes you to
Amazon.com If you buy ANYTHING while there, they pay for the referral.
Legal notices: "As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases." Paid links).
I'd rather have a bottle in front of me than a frontal lobotomy.