As of 12/20/2024
Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%
Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%
Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%
Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%
S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%
|
YTD
+13.7%
0.0%
+11.9%
+30.4%
+24.3%
|
 44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/2025 16,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/20251,050 or 975 by 01/01/202520,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/20256,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025 |
As of 12/20/2024
Indus: 42,840 +498.02 +1.2%
Trans: 15,892 +32.54 +0.2%
Utils: 986 +14.76 +1.5%
Nasdaq: 19,573 +199.83 +1.0%
S&P 500: 5,931 +63.77 +1.1%
|
YTD
+13.7%
0.0%
+11.9%
+30.4%
+24.3%
| |
|
44,200 or 41,750 by 01/01/202516,100 or 17,700 by 01/01/20251,050 or 975 by 01/01/202520,500 or 19,300 by 01/01/20256,100 or 5,775 by 01/01/2025 | ||
Lessons are learned the hard way, and I am going to share one with you now. I think it's like telling a boy not to touch a hot stove. "You're gonna get burned..." you warn, but he touches it anyway.
The lesson is simple. If a stock you own gaps up by 5% or more, sell it the next day. That event pattern is called an inverted dead-cat bounce, and I am finding it to be one of the more reliable patterns. This article discusses a trade using that event pattern.
$ $ $
For an in-depth analysis of event patterns, grab a copy of my book,
Encyclopedia of Chart Patterns Second Edition
If you click on the above link and then buy the book (or anything) while at Amazon.com, the referral will help support this site. Thanks.
$ $ $
An inverted dead-cat bounce is an event pattern so named because it seemed to be the opposite of a dead-cat bounce.
The inverted dead-cat bounce occurs when a company announces news that sends the stock soaring by 5% to 20% or even higher. This event is not caused by takeover news because that event pattern shows a stock moving up and staying up. Rather, the inverted dead-cat bounce is often earnings related or because of positive results from clinical drug trials, patent dispute resolutions, legal awards, contract wins, oil patch discoveries, and so on.
After price spikes upward, it often drops back down within a week or two.
A frequency distribution of price movement over time suggests that fewer than half the stocks make a higher high the day after the announcement, but you can place a limit order to sell at the prior day's high and see if it hits. You will want to day trade the exit, if you can, to maximize profits.
That is the lesson. Let's see how it applies to an actual trade.
When the Obama administration took office in late January 2009, I remember Mrs. Obama getting press for liking J. Crew clothing, but I dismissed it. Then in April, I heard the news stories again while exercising on my treadmill. I thought, "The company is going to have a good quarter because of the publicity." So, I bought the stock as the chart shows (daily scale).
Not shown is that the stock had broken above a congestion area setup by a three peak formation in December 2008 (think triple top or head-and-shoulders top). After that, I held onto the stock.
Fast forward to May 28. I show that as point A on the chart, the day before price gapped up. The company reported quarterly earnings after the close. Profit dropped a massive 33%, but the company predicted profits in the next quarter instead of a loss the street was expecting.
The next day, price gapped open higher. A day later, sell day (B), I thought about this situation and decided to hold. I thought the rise had legs, meaning it would continued moving up in the coming days. That happens sometimes, not from better than expected earnings, but most often from future guidance by the company, as in this case.
As you can see, holding was a mistake. I eventually sold and made 65% on the trade, but I could have done better. I sold at 25.296 but the day after the event (B), the stock ranged from 25.90 to 27.94. After I sold, the stock bottomed at 22.58.
The moral of the story is this: If the market gives you a gift, take it and run before it snatches it back.
When price climbed out of a congestion zone, I bought and received a fill at $1.64. I forgot about the earnings report. My intent was to hold the stock for the long term, to see it climb from 1.64 to 17 or even 25.
Each day price seemed to climb but I did not focus on it. If the stock market did well (which I expect), then the stock would also. Why? Because insurance companies take their outrageous premiums they charge you and me and invest it in the stock market. If their investments rise, the worth of the company rises and the stock should follow.
When I looked at CNO this morning (Monday 5/11/2009). It did not dawn on me that the stock had gapped up 45% (from yesterday's close of 2.69 to a high so far of 3.90). Then I went searching for the reason for the gap. Earnings. The company announced earnings this morning, something that I forgot about. Fortunately, they were better than the market expected.
Knowing that I bought the stock at $1.64 and it was now at 3.50 and dropping, I decided to pocket my winnings. I sold it and received a fill at $3.47.
Here are my reasons for the sale.
Over the coming months, the stock never posted a higher high (as of July 22, 2009) and dropped to a low of 1.68 on June 17, 2009, about a month after I sold, dropping back to near my buy price.
Other stocks in 2009 have made inverted dead-cat bounces. Here is a small sample.
-- Thomas Bulkowski
Support this site! Clicking any of the books (below) takes you to
Amazon.com If you buy ANYTHING while there, they pay for the referral.
Legal notice for paid links: "As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases."
|
My Stock Market Books
|
My Novels
|
Zeus said to Narcissus, "Watch yourself."
on 